Skip to main content

Rosalind Franklin: An Unsung Hero in DNA Discovery



Who discovered the double helix structure of DNA? Were they really Watson and Crick?

For years, we have been told that the famous "Double Helix" structure of the DNA was discovered by two scientists, James Watson and Francis Crick and for that, they even won a Nobel Prize along with the other scientist, Maurice Wilkins. But was it really a true story? First of all, what is DNA?

DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid):

DNA, an abbreviation for "Deoxyribonucleic Acid" is a chain (well, two chains) of molecules or deoxyribose sugars (Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, Thymine). It is an essential constituent of chromosomes that make up almost every cell of our bodies. From hair color to eye color, height, skin color, and even genetic diseases and disorders, DNA plays a vital part in our bodies.




Structure of DNA:

Before 1952, nobody knew the real structure of DNA. Scientists were trying hard to chalk out, and research was in full swing then. One female scientist, Rosalind Franklin, working at King's  College, London, as an X-Ray Crystallographer, was also studying the structure of DNA with her colleague Maurice Wilkins.

Rosalind Franklin:

She graduated in 1941 with a degree in natural sciences and then enrolled for a Ph.D. in physical chemistry at the University of Cambridge where she studied coal that had earned her Ph.D. After that, she moved to Paris in 1947 where she became an accomplished X-Ray Crystallographer. Later on, she joined King's College in 1951 as a research associate. 

Rosalind Franklin



Research for DNA in 1951:

After joining King's College, London, Franklin was working with a colleague named Maurice Wilkins and her student Raymond Gosling. She was working on the fine structure of DNA through the X-Ray crystallography technique. Other scientists and researchers were also working very hard to achieve the image, two of them named James Watson and Francis Crick.

Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins

James Watson and Francis Crick:

Two young scientists, James Watson, a Ph.D. in Genetics, and Francis Crick, a bachelor's in Physics started working at Cavendish Laboratory to tackle the same challenge as other scientists. They were collecting different images and photographs of the DNA to finalize the one and only perfect image that would be the biggest discovery of the century and that would change the course of biological research and biotechnology.

Watson and Crick



Working with Maurice Wilkins:

Nobody knows the real intentions of their acquaintances, lab partners, or even their closest friends. Maurice Wilkins, although a very talented scientist, was burning with jealousy for Rosalind Franklin and her rather stubborn behavior. On the opposite side, James Watson and Francis Crick were working days and nights to achieve a stunning image of the structure of DNA. Rosalind Franklin, by that time, had achieved the DNA image by X-Ray diffraction that was named the legendary "Photo 51" in history. On the other hand, Wilkins, without Franklin's permission, gave that image to Watson and Crick that had changed the whole story and stopped all the research because, that one final image, had been achieved! The Double Helix Structure of the DNA was discovered!

Photo 51





Conclusion:

Who was the real discoverer of the DNA's fine structure? Was it only Rosalind Franklin? Watson and Crick? Or even Maurice Wilkins? We cannot simply say that Franklin deserves all of the credit because Watson and Crick were already working on the image, Franklin's image cut off their work by most probably 75% and completed their research. Franklin alone did not have any idea what she had discovered, and her work was fuel for Watson and Crick. Franklin, along with Watson and Crick, deserves the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine that was given to Wilkins instead. Although we cannot debate more on that because Rosalind Franklin died before the Nobel Prize was awarded.

James Watson About Rosalind Franklin:

"She provided some crucial pieces of information.  Her great handicap, which I would now say we would use the term Asperger’s, she didn’t know how to deal with other people; didn’t know how to ask for help. And, if anything, probably paranoid about people stealing her data." (September 28, 2010)





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The Invisible Constituents of the Universe

  Physicists say that only 5% of this universe is created of matter or atoms (electrons, protons, and neutrons). Then what is the rest 95% made of if not atoms? Well, we call that dark matter and dark energy!  Illustration of Dark Matter Dark Matter: Earlier we thought that this universe of ours was made up of only baryons and leptons, i.e. electrons, protons, and neutrons. But subsequently, we found out that this theory was not fully accurate and only 5% of this universe is made up of visible matter. The rest 25% consists of "Dark Matter". Dark here is used because we cannot see this, yet we can only sense its presence because of its gravitational pull. We deduced that it has mass because it creates a gravitational field.  An Image of a Cluster. Pink here is normal matter and blue indicates Dark matter which is overpowering the pink one. Image Credit: NASA Dark Energy:  It is more peculiar than Dark Matter because it takes up the rest of 70% of the universe. It repels gravit

Do White Holes Really Exist?

Everything has two outcomes or possibilities. Day and night, plus and minus, front and back, light and dark, etc. In the same manner, black holes have another possibility too, the "White Holes". White Hole Image Credit: New Scientist What Actually is a White Hole: A white hole is a theoretical region in space that emits and throws away every matter, even light. It is the exact opposite of a black hole that sucks up everything, including light.  See also:  Black Holes How is a White Hole Formed? When a very massive star dies, it is crushed under its own matter and gravity that it turns into a black hole, but before it could turn into a complete black hole, the quantum effects reverse the process and bounce off the matter and gravity, causing a white hole to be formed.  Is White Hole Real? Currently, there is no such evidence that white holes actually exist in space, it's just a theoretical prediction of Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Still, there is a high probabilit